Pre-validation evidence readiness
We review your PDD against the applicable methodology and show you what is supported, what is unclear, and what still needs action before validation starts.
Independent review designed to complement your existing project team and consultants.
Article6 Carbon
Evidence readiness assessment
The hidden risk
A requirement may be addressed in the document while the evidence behind it is incomplete, difficult to trace, or inconsistent with the supporting files.
The PDD makes a material claim, but the supporting evidence is not identified clearly enough for a reviewer to trace it.
The support exists somewhere in annexes, calculations, maps, or supporting documents, but a reviewer has to hunt for it.
The methodology requirement is discussed, but the justification or supporting evidence is incomplete.
The PDD and its calculations, maps, annexes, or supporting files do not tell exactly the same story.
These are the gaps that become clarification requests, rework, and additional review cycles during validation.
What we do
Article6 independently reviews the PDD and supporting documentation to identify where evidence is strong, where it is unclear, and where something still needs to be resolved.
You get a practical list of issues your team can work through before they become questions from an external reviewer.
Find it earlier. Fix it on your schedule. Enter validation better prepared.
How we do it
For every applicable requirement, we create a traceable path through the project documentation.
Methodology requirement
PDD reference
Supporting evidence
Assessment
Risk
Required action
Illustrative review record
Review path
Requirement review
Applicable methodology
That makes it possible to see not just that an issue exists, but exactly why it was raised and what evidence would resolve it.
Structured analysis. Human-reviewed conclusions.
What you get
Every applicable requirement is tied back to the relevant part of the PDD and supporting evidence, so your team can see exactly what supports each conclusion.
A structured record connecting methodology requirements to the relevant claims, evidence, assessment, risk, and next action.
The issues most likely to create clarification, rework, or delay during validation.
Clear guidance on what needs to be added, clarified, reconciled, or documented.
A practical description of what “resolved” looks like for each finding.
A record your team can keep using
The Evidence Map preserves the reasoning and source trail behind the PDD in a structure other members of the team can follow. If people move on, the project retains a usable record of the work.
Not a black-box score. Every finding is traceable.
See the output
Illustrative findings for demonstration only. Not from a real client project.
How to get started
Upload the current version through our secure form. We will review the project scope, confirm the applicable methodology and version, and let you know if we need any additional documentation before beginning the assessment.
Submitting your PDD is only the first scope-review step. It does not commit you to purchase the service.
Your documents are transmitted securely and stored privately.
Article6 provides independent pre-validation evidence readiness assessments designed to complement project developers, consultants, and VVBs. We do not perform validation, make registry decisions, or guarantee acceptance by Verra or any validation and verification body.